Monday, March 7, 2011

Civilization… hmmm?

Watching the "news" from Afghanistan on a German television channel the other night, the reporter drew attention to the problems the troops were facing there, in a "rather undeveloped civilization". So what the heck was I to understand with what he was saying? What is  understood by "Civilization"?

Wikipedia: Civilization is a sometimes controversial term which has been used in several related ways. Primarily, the term has been used to refer to human cultures which are complex in terms of technology, science, politics and division of labour. Such civilizations are generally urbanized. In classical contexts civilized peoples were called this in contrast to "barbarian" peoples, while in modern contexts civilized peoples have been contrasted to "primitive" peoples.

WordWeb: Civilization is a “Society in an advanced state of social development (e.g., with complex legal and political and religious organizations)”

Henry Miller: “Civilization is drugs, alcohol, engines of war, prostitution, machines and machine slaves, low wages, bad food, bad taste, prisons, reformatories, lunatic asylums, divorce, perversion, brutal sports, suicides, infanticide, cinema, quackery, demagogy, strikes, lockouts, revolutions, putsches, colonization, electric chairs, guillotines, sabotage, floods, famine, disease, gangsters, money barons, horse racing, fashion shows, poodle dogs, chow dogs, Siamese cats, condoms, pessaries, syphilis, gonorrhea, insanity, neuroses, etc., etc.”

Hmmmm?... : Somehow, to me, it seems rather evident, that Henry Miller is the one who has jotted down the best definition of civilization. I mean, if you take an objective look at what the "pinnacle of western civilization" today  does to, and with, the –in their opinion- not so civilized  parts of the world, and, indeed also with mankind in their own “society in an advanced state of social development”, our civilized part of the world can hardly be labeled  anything but plain uncivilized?...  barbarian peoples kowtowing to their lunatic leaders? 

Hmmmm?...: Well… yes… in my opinion, Henry Miller did indeed  have the very right definition on the decadency named "civilization". And!... I bet my last wooden nickel that the people in all parts of the world, who are constantly screwed and raped by our “civilization”, will agree with him 100%... and so do I… but of course… that’s because I’m a "barbarian" in accordance with Wikipedia.

Monday, December 13, 2010

Who the heck are all these politicians that we believe we elect?


Watching and listening to the video embedded above, which is a recording of a speech given by Obama Barrack to AIPAC, before he was "elected" president, ought to produce a bit more than raised eyebrows. 
Myself, I could hardly believe what I heard and saw when I first came across this video, and some passages from the "Protocol of the Learned Elders of Zion" emerged vaguely in my mind. I had to look them up:


".... until there will no longer be any risk in entrusting responsible posts in our State to our brother-Jews, we shall put them in the hands of persons whose past and reputation are such that between them and the people lies an abyss, persons who, in case of disobedience to our instructions, must face criminal charges or disappear - this in order to make them defend our interests to their last gasp."

"... It is from us that the all-engulfing terror proceeds. We have in our service persons of  all opinions, of all doctrines, restorating monarchists, demagogues, socialists, communists, and utopia dreamers of every kind. We have harnessed them all to the task: Each one of them on his own account is boring at the last remnants of authority, is striving to overthrow all established form of order. By these acts all States are in torture; they exhort to tranquility, are ready to sacrifice everything for peace: But we will not give them peace until they openly acknowledge our international super-government, and with submissiveness." 

Much have been written about the "Protocols", but with an objective view at the world history over the last hundred years, and watching what is happening in our world today, there can hardly be any question about it's remarkable "predictions". Who ever is (are) pulling the strings, they are indeed minutely following the "program" and "goals" presented in this astonishing, and more than one hundred year old, document.

And, then, if you take the time to read the "Protocols" carefully, all of them, from 1. through 24., I am pretty sure you will, like me, say, -"The ongoing destruction of economies, is indeed nothing that just happens. The economical ruin of Greece, Iceland and Ireland... with Portugal, Spain, Italy and finally the whole EU to follow, is indeed in accordance with a master plan!" And as for the US economy... well technically speaking, the American economy is even closer to being totally  bankrupt today than it was in 1929, so I think it is only fair to say, that the goal set forth in the "Protocols", pretty much has been achieved.

Whatever, the bankruptcy of nations and the world at large, lies in the hands of the few banksters who own the FED and the ECB -owns the right to print and issue the two fiat monies out of nothing- so it is definitely in their power to pull (the string), just like Mr. Larry Silverstein  ordered the "pull" which brought down "Tower 7" on  Sept. 11. Watch the video below!  These guys are more than mere magicians in the field of producing money! :-) And, I am willing to bet my last wooden nickel on, that the pull is just around the corner.

"But when the comedy is played out there emerges the fact that a debit and an exceedingly burdensome debit has been created. For the payment of interest it becomes necessary to have recourse to new loans, which do not swallow up but only add to the capital debt. And when this credit is exhausted it becomes necessary by new taxes to cover, not the loan, BUT ONLY THE INTEREST ON IT. These taxes are a debit employed to cover a debit .... "

It takes great expertise and much time to arrange for a controlled and perfect demolition of a high-rise building, before the pull can be made, turning it all into rubble and dust, and making a fortune by doing it. Mr. Silverstein made a $1.5 Billion profit on WTC-7 alone!.
And so it also is  with the demolition of world economies. It takes expertise, much time and careful planning... in order to make a profit out of  the destruction of an economy... but the banksters manage to do that... with every small pull they make... through the one bail-out after the other... all being part of  the big pull which is still to come. The plan for that ultimate one, which is laid out in details in the "Protocols", has been worked on for more than a hundred years. It has been worked on for generations, but of course, the stake is no mere billions... it is the world at large... it's the final "winner takes all".

"We shall surround our government with a whole world of economists. That is the reason why economic sciences form the principal subject of the teaching given to the Jews (see note below) . Around us again will be a whole constellation of bankers, industrialists, capitalists and - THE MAIN THING - MILLIONAIRES, BECAUSE IN SUBSTANCE EVERYTHING WILL BE SETTLED BY THE QUESTION OF FIGURES." (Note: I think Jews here and elsewhere in the "Protocols"  is a deliberate misnomer used by the writers of the document, and Jew(s) should be read/understood as Zionist(s)

"We shall create by all the secret subterranean methods open to us and with the aid of gold, which is all in our hands, A UNIVERSAL ECONOMIC CRISES WHEREBY WE SHALL THROW UPON THE STREETS WHOLE MOBS OF WORKERS SIMULTANEOUSLY IN ALL THE COUNTRIES OF EUROPE. 

Tuesday, June 8, 2010

A Warning about Ticks in Norway

A friend of mine who is touring Norway with a camper this summer of 2010, sent me a warning related to ticks, and which reads as follows:

Dear Brandulph,
- I hate it when people forward bogus warnings, and (as you well knows)I have even done it myself a couple times (unintentionally) but this one is real, Brandulph, and it's very important, since I know you will travel north as well this summer.
- If someone comes to your camper (or door), presenting themselves as Norwegian Health Officials, saying they are checking for ticks due to the warm weather, and then tell you to take all your clothes off and dance around with your arms up; DO NOT DO IT! THIS IS A SCAM!
- They only want to see you naked, Brandulph, and I wish I'd gotten a notice about this scam yesterday. Both Henrietta and I feel so stupid and embarrassed. Best regards!

Hmmm... well folks, if you intend to do vacationing in Norway this summer... I have warned you about the tick scam. And, for all you naked ass freaks out there who just love to expose yourself... well, Norway might indeed be the right place for you to vacation this summer.

Thursday, May 13, 2010

A most amazing letter from a United States Representative

Dear Kimberly:

I was recently catching up on my correspondence and realized I had not yet responded to your message. Thank you for contacting me about the Federal Reserve Transparency Act (HR 1207). I appreciate hearing from you and apologize for the delay in my response.
As you may know, HR 1207 would repeal the restrictions on Federal Reserve audits and require the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to conduct an audit of the Federal Reserve immediately and make its findings available to Congress. HR 1207 has been referred to the House Committee on Financial Services where it awaits further review.
I do not support HR 1207 and will not be signing on as a cosponsor to this legislation. I would like to take this opportunity to explain my position to you.
The Federal Reserve is already subject to independent audits. The GAO has audited the Federal Reserve over 100 times since it was created in 1913. The Federal Reserve has also been audited dozens of times by independent accounting firms.
The GAO is not allowed to audit the Federal Reserve’s decisions on monetary policy or its transactions with foreign governments and central banks for very good reason. Opening up the Federal Reserve’s day-to-day decisions on monetary policy exposes our monetary policy to politics. The Federal Reserve is an independent agency for a reason. If the financial markets think that the Fed’s actions are politicized, investors will lose confidence in the Federal Reserve and our markets will decline.
The Federal Reserve and Congress have recently taken steps to increase the transparency of the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve has begun publishing their balance sheet on their website, This report gives information about the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet and lending programs and provides considerable new information about the number of borrowers at their various facilities, and the collateral pledged.
I believe the Federal Reserve should continue to be subject to public scrutiny. The Federal Reserve does not always make the right decisions. Both Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan have admitted that the Federal Reserve has made mistakes in the past. Congress is learning from these mistakes and I am working with my colleagues to fix them through reforming the regulation of our financial markets to prevent a crisis from reoccurring. As the 111th Congress progresses I will be sure to keep your thoughts in mind.
Thank you again for taking the time to contact me. Although we disagree on this issue I am sure there are many more issues on which we agree. Please do not hesitate to contact me in the future about this or other issues of concern for you.

Rick Larsen
United States Representative
Washington State, 2nd District


I have been following the brave and tireless efforts by Congressman Ron Paul, in his fight for transparency and a full audit of The Federal Reserve(FED), and when reading the above letter from Mr. Larsen, addressed to the signature “Kimberly”, I could not resist the posting of a few comments to him on what his representative writes.

Hi there Kimberly,

Bearing in mind that the FED is a privately owned entity with the right to produce and distribute the US fiat money, the answer from your "representative", Mr. Larsen, reveals that he is totally corrupted and/or plain stupid. In any case, he is, in my opinion, totally incompetent for a position as a United States Representative. (However, having said that, may I hastily add the sad fact, that people mostly get the representatives they deserve. ;-)
The paragraph from Mr. Larsen’s letter, quoted below, reveals that as a sad and disturbing fact, and on which I would like to present a few comments. (I have split the paragraph into four elements, A, B, C and D):

(A) The GAO is not allowed to audit the Federal Reserve’s decisions on monetary policy or its transactions with foreign governments and central banks for very good reason.
(B) Opening up the Federal Reserve’s day-to-day decisions on monetary policy exposes our monetary policy to politics.
(C) The Federal Reserve is an independent agency for a reason.
(D) If the financial markets think that the Fed’s actions are politicized, investors will lose confidence in the Federal Reserve and our markets will decline.

My comments:

First, let me open with a question raised by the brilliant German sociologist and political economist, Max Weber, in his speech "Politics as a Vocation" : -"What do we understand by politics?"

-politic: Marked by artful prudence, expedience, and shrewdness
-politics: Social relations involving intrigue to gain authority or power.
-policy: A plan of action adopted by an individual or social group
-politician: A schemer who tries to gain advantage in an organization in sly or underhanded ways.
-political: Involving or characteristic of politics or parties or politicians.

(A) The sole reason why the FED desperately hang on to secrecy about their decisions on monetary policy and its transactions with foreign governments and central banks secret, is to avoid insight in the nature of their policy. A policy which of course is that of their private owners. Power and personal profit are their sole motives.
(B) Opening up the FED’s day-to-day decisions on monetary policy, does not expose "our" policy, but the FE D's monetary policy and politics. Mr. Larsen seems to have a problem with the distinction between "ours" and "theirs". (And, should Mr. Larsen be uncorrupted, it is in any case quite evident that he has not been able to comprehend the text written in HR 1207.)
(C) The Federal Reserve is an independent agency for a reason, Mr. Larsen states. Yes, indeed there is a reason! A reason which was spelled out very blunt and clearly years back, by the "capo di tutti capi" among the bankster families: -"Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes the laws."
(D) Hmmm... here Mr. Larsen offers a mind-boggling display of political gibber. Why? Well, those in the financial market who might think that the FED is a federal entity believe that the policy of the FED is that of the US of A. Those who know that the FED is a privately owned entity know that the policy of the FED is that of the owners. And, the Fed’s actions are of course always politicized, i.e. their actions have the political character of the FED owners. (Is that hard to understand?)
The reason why "investors" are loosing confidence in the USD is that they slowly realize that the FED is not a federal entity. And unless the control of the USA legal tender is given back to the Senate, all confidence will indeed, eventually be lost. That would mean that not only the US markets would decline, but the whole world financial system would collapse.

However, it might all be too late. The owners of The European Central Bank (ECB) and the FED are the same. They both enjoy the same incredible privileges, given them by corrupt and/or plain stupid politicians.The present financial crisis in the Europe Union and the actions taken demonstrate this, as well as the truth i the old words of wisdom: "Money rules the world."

And, since Mayer Amschel Bauer, the Godfather of the world wide Rothschild Banking Cartel, got it his way, their "New World Government" dictatorship seems frightening close.

-"The home of the brave and the land of the free"... hmmm.

The FED and the ECB are both like cancer... killing their victim slowly over time... without apparent symptoms nor pain... until the very end... when no pain killer can give relief of the unendurable pain the victim is suffering.